Accountability in federal and state programs is becoming increasingly important, and these programs are often required to collect administrative data to track services and demonstrate their progress or effectiveness. There is a growing understanding of the promise of these data, as improvements in technology and statistical methods make it possible to use administrative data for research purposes. Whether the data are collected by federal agencies, state governments, private industry, or local programs, attention has turned to the potential for using these data for policy and program evaluation. As outlined in The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) memo M-14-06, Guidance for Providing and Using Administrative Data for Statistical Purposes, there are high-quality and reliable data that can provide the foundation for research and evaluation to help understand how public needs are changing, how well policy and programs are addressing those needs, and where greater progress could be made.
The primary advantage of using administrative data for research is that agencies collect the data as part of their regular procedures. This means that data can be obtained from large populations over time without fielding a survey, which is expensive and burdensome for respondents. In addition, agencies stand to benefit from research that can inform their decisions about policies and programs. There are many innovative ways to capitalize on administrative data, including longitudinal follow-ups and analyses, conducting experiments by using existing lottery systems to randomly assign individuals to services, and linking across datasets from different agencies to understand service utilization and outcomes across a variety of domains. However, there are many challenges in using administrative data for research purposes, including difficulty gaining access to the data, concerns about privacy and confidentiality, linking across data sources, data quality, and unique analytic issues.
This meeting will focus on understanding what kinds of research question can be addressed using administrative data. Speakers will share their experience and knowledge around access and use of various types of administrative data for research purposes. It may include presentations and discussions on the following questions:
The meeting will convene federal staff and researchers with an interest in expanding and improving utilization of administrative data. The ultimate goals of the meeting are to 1) better understand the availability and application of administrative data; 2) identify the promises and challenges involved in using such data; and 3) promote capacity, utilization, and innovative uses of administrative data.
8:30 – 9:00
Maria Cancian, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Administration for Children and Families
9:00 – 10:00
Slide Deck: The role of administrative data in evidence-based policy and innovation
Kathy Stack, Laura and John Arnold FoundationSlide Deck: Challenges in using administrative data: Legal, technical and political
John Petrila, University of South Florida
10:15 – 12:00
Moderator
Molly Irwin, Chief Evaluation Office, Department of Labor
Discussant
Kelly Maxwell, Child Trends
Panelists:
Beth Green, Portland State University
Charles Michalopoulos, MDRC
Maya Bernstein, Department of Health and Human Services
Jennifer Noyes, University of Wisconsin
1:30 – 3:15
Moderator
Nicole Constance, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation
Slide Deck:The long term impacts of cash transfers to poor families
Anna Aizer, Brown UniversitySlide Deck: Evaluating a large-scale high school reform using administrative data from a naturally-occurring randomized trial
Howard Bloom, MDRCSlide Deck: Treatment costs among adults with serious mental illness: Influence of criminal justice involvement and psychiatric diagnoses
Allison G. Robertson, Duke UniversitySlide Deck: The role of administrative data within economic evaluation
Max Crowley, Penn State University
3:30 – 5:00
Moderator
Anupa Bir, RTI International
Slide Deck: Building data sharing infrastructure at the state level
Aaron Schroeder, Virginia TechSlide Deck: Linking data across multiple states and multiple data sources
Julia Henly, University of ChicagoSlide Deck: Challenges in linking state and federal datasets
Robert Goerge, Chapin HallSlide Deck: The role of the policy context in using and understanding administrative data
Elizabeth Davis, University of Minnesota
8:45 – 10:15
Moderator
Anna Solmeyer, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation
Slide Deck: Quick turnaround with administrative health data
Katherine Giuriceo, Center for Medicare and Medicaid InnovationSlide Deck: Using random assignment to test “nudge” messaging on SNAP applications
Kinsey Dinan, NYC Human Resources AdministrationSlide Deck: Using aggregate state assessment data to assess the impact of school-based interventions
Robin Jacob, University of MichiganSlide Deck: Estimating the impact of reserve activation on earnings: Survey vs. administrative data
Jacob Klerman, Abt Associates
10:30 – 12:00
Moderator
Christine Fortunato, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation
Census Bureau efforts to utilize and share data
Amy O’Hara, Census BureauSlide Deck: Building state capacity to use longitudinal data systems
Missy Cochenour, AEM CorporationSlide Deck: Improving service delivery through administrative data integration and analytics
David Mancuso, Washington State Department of Social and Health ServicesSlide Deck: Integrated data systems and their utility for policy research and evaluation
John Fantuzzo, University of Pennsylvania
Roundtable Discussion: The Promises and Challenges of Administrative Data in Social Policy Research